As pet owners and animal lovers, it's essential to understand the laws surrounding dog bites and attacks to ensure the safety and well-being of both humans and animals. In the state of Maryland, specific statutes govern liability for dog bites and provide guidelines for seeking compensation in the event of an injury. Let's explore Maryland's dog bite laws to help you better understand your rights and responsibilities:

1. Strict Liability:
   
   Maryland is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that dog owners can be held liable for injuries caused by their dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was dangerous or had a history of aggressive behavior. The law applies both to injuries that occur on public property and on private property where the victim is lawfully present.
   
   
2. One-Bite Rule:
   
   Unlike some states that follow a "one-bite rule," which essentially gives dog owners a pass for the first bite, Maryland imposes strict liability from the very first bite. This means that dog owners are responsible for any injuries caused by their dog, regardless of whether the dog has bitten someone before.
   
   
3. Contributory Negligence:
   
   It's important to note that Maryland follows the legal doctrine of contributory negligence. This means that if the victim of a dog bite is found to have contributed to their own injury in any way, they may be barred from recovering compensation. For example, if the victim provoked the dog or trespassed on the owner's property, their claim may be invalidated.
   
   
4. Statute of Limitations:
   
   In Maryland, there is a limited time frame within which a dog bite victim can file a lawsuit seeking compensation. The statute of limitations for personal injury claims, including dog bites, is generally three years from the date of the injury. It's crucial to act promptly and consult with an attorney if you believe you have a valid claim.
   
   
5. Defenses for Dog Owners:
   
   While Maryland's dog bite laws impose strict liability on dog owners, there are some defenses available to them. For example, if the victim was trespassing on the owner's property at the time of the incident or was engaged in unlawful activity, the owner may be able to avoid liability. Additionally, if the dog was provoked or harassed by the victim, this may serve as a defense for the owner.

Conclusion